Blog Layout

Can you be personally liable for your business’s liabilities? Possibly!

May 24, 2022

Can you be personally liable for your business’s liabilities? Possibly!

If you are a business owner, you might operate your business under your name, a different name but as an unincorporated entity, or through a separate business entity. In Tennessee, it is common to operate businesses as a limited liability company (“LLCs”). This blog is to continue the discussion started in a previous post (click here for prior post) regarding the benefits of forming an LLC in Tennessee and to briefly discuss piercing the corporate veil, a mechanism to hold a business owner personally liable for the business’s liabilities..

In my previous post, I list “limited liability” as a benefit, if not the number one benefit, to forming an LLC in Tennessee. Just to refresh your memory, in an LLC, members are generally not personally liable for the actions of the company. In other words, members are afforded limited liability. Generally, a member’s personal assets are protected. Limited liability has its limits, and there are some instances where you could be personally liable.


HYPOTHETICAL: let’s assume that you validly formed your LLC in Tennessee, but someone, maybe a former client, customer, business partner, or employee (just to list a few potential parties) sues your company but also identifies you, individually, in the lawsuit. Generally speaking, LLCs protect you individually from being liable; however, Tennessee courts, under certain circumstances, will disregard the LLC as a separate entity if there is evidence that it is a sham or as “necessary to accomplish justice.” This is commonly referred to as “piercing the corporate veil.”



Although this doctrine originally applied to corporations, Tennessee courts have held that this doctrine also applies to LLCs. See Starnes Family Office, LLC v. McCullar, 765 F. Supp. 2d 1036, 1049 (W.D. Tenn. 2011). Piercing the corporate veil allows for an individual to “pierce” the company and go after the assets of the individual principals of the company. Usually, courts caution that the veil should only be pierced and thus individuals held personally liable for the debts of the company in extreme circumstances; however, Tennessee courts look at whether the business entity has been used to conduct fraud or injustice, as well as, the following factors in determining whether to pierce the corporate veil:

  • whether there was a failure to collect paid in capital;
  • whether the corporation was grossly undercapitalized;
  • the non-issuance of stock certificates;
  • the sole ownership of stock by one individual;
  • the use of the same office or business location;
  • the employment of the same employees or attorneys;
  • the use of the corporation as an instrumentality or business conduit for an individual or another corporation;
  • the diversion of corporate assets by or to a stockholder or other entity to the detriment of creditors, or the manipulation of assets and liabilities in another;
  • the use of the corporation as a subterfuge in illegal transactions;
  • the formation and use of the corporation to transfer to it the existing liability of another person or entity; and
  • the failure to maintain arm’s length relationships among related entities.

Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Allen, 584 F. Supp. 386, 397 (E.D. Tenn. 1984). Tennessee courts will rely upon a combination of these factors in deciding whether to pierce the corporate veil and hold an individual liable. The question of when an individual should be held liable for an LLC’s obligations is a factual determination, so each case is different. This makes it impossible to define a clear rule on piercing the veil; however, LLC members and managers should be aware of the factors outlined in the Allen case noted above to avoid being subject to individual liability.


Forming an LLC may not be the best option for your business. There are several different entities to choose from: sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited liability company etc. Each different entity will have its benefits and disadvantages. Each situation is different, and although LLCs continue to grow in popularity, an attorney can help you weigh the benefits, consequences, and potential ramifications of forming your business.


About the Author: Patrick Morrison is an attorney with Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. (“GKH”). Patrick is a native to the Chattanooga area and a graduate from Chattanooga School for the Arts and Sciences. Patrick graduated from Middle Tennessee State University in Murfreesboro, Tennessee and received his Doctor of Jurisprudence from the University of Tennessee College of Law. Patrick is an experienced lawyer relating to contracts and business law. To learn more about Patrick or GKH, contact Patrick at 423-756-8400 or email him.


This blog is not intended to create an attorney/client relationship or provide legal advice. Please contact the author if you have any questions or comments regarding the subject matter.


immigration law
05 Mar, 2024
New Fee Schedule Will Take Effect on April 1, 2024 
22 Jan, 2024
The Board of Directors of Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison ("GKH"), a Chattanooga law firm, are pleased to announce the election of Kane Shepherd as Director at the firm. Kane guides clients in all aspects of real estate matters, financial and lending transactions, and mergers & acquisitions. Kane represents clients ranging from startups to businesses with large international footprints. Kane is a native of Montana who joined the firm in 2019. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Montana, and received his J.D. with a concentration in business transactions from the University of Tennessee in 2018. Prior to joining GKH, Kane clerked at the Hamilton County Chancery Court for the Honorable Pamela A. Fleenor and the Honorable Jeffrey M. Atherton, and previously worked as a wildland firefighter for the U.S. Forest Service. To learn more about Mr. Shepherd, please visit his webpage at http://www.gkhpc.com . Contact him at 423-756-8400 or by email at kshepherd@gkhpc.com .
22 Jan, 2024
Five Things to Never Assume About Artificial Intelligence
22 Aug, 2023
David Higney Recognized By Best Lawyers in America for Environmental Law and Energy Regulatory Law
14 Feb, 2023
Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison is please to announce the election of Ms. Sawhill as a Director at the Firm
By Sandy Vander Griend 14 Feb, 2023
Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison is pleased to announce the election of Ms. Lentz as a Director at the Firm
By Sandy Vander Griend 14 Feb, 2023
Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison is pleased to announce the election of Ms. Floberg as a Director at the Firm
By Sandy Vander Griend 14 Feb, 2023
CBA members voted in by acclamation Katherine Lentz, Keith Grant, and Logan Threadgill
07 Dec, 2022
Congratulations to Brittany T. Faith on her recognition as a Volunteer 40 Under 40 recognizes forty alumni under the age of 40 who have excelled personally and professionally since completing their degree at UT Knoxville. Brittany Faith is a nationally recognized immigration attorney who has committed herself to service. At UT’s College of Law she was heavily involved in community service and leadership roles, including serving as director of UT Law’s Pro Bono program; treasurer of Law Women, American Bar Association (ABA) representative for the Student Bar Association; American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) Midsouth law school liaison, and creator/founder of UT Law’s U Visa Alternative Spring Break. Faith currently serves as the Tennessee Bar Association Young Lawyers Division president, one of only 21 elected directors across the country to the AILA Board of Governors, and the Fit2Practice director for the ABA Young Lawyers Division Council. In addition, she regularly donates her time to pro bono and low bono immigration work, which is an area of law with a lack of resources due to federal funding limitations.
More Posts
Share by: